Achieving the title of being high-income is what every country dreams of. But the climb, much like conquering Mount Everest, is built with impossible terrain and hidden dangers. One particularly difficult obstacle? The middle-income trap. Stuck at a particular point, far too close to the peak yet frustratingly out of reach, this is the predicament facing many Latin American economies.

The middle-income trap isn’t a new concept. It describes a situation where developing countries, after making significant headway, find themselves stagnant. They can no longer compete with low-income countries on prices for basic goods (thanks to rising wages) but lack the innovation and infrastructure to compete with developed nations in high-value sectors. It’s like reaching Camp Four on Everest – you’ve made incredible progress, but the death zone is called the death zone for a reason, and the finish line seems increasingly distant.

There are a few reasons why this happens. One is a lack of investment in research and development (R&D). Another? Educational systems that produce graduates who are not ready for the demands of a modern, knowledge-based economy. Imagine trying to climb Everest in flip-flops, yes it may be comfortable but not exactly a winning strategy.

The Latin American Icefall

Countries like Argentina and Brazil experienced periods of rapid economic growth but haven’t been able to sustain it. This can be due to various factors like reliance on volatile commodity prices or lack of investment in infrastructure and innovation.

Latin America, a region known for its spirit and resilience, finds itself balancing on this middle-income icefall. The past few decades have seen impressive economic growth, but recent years have brought a concerning slowdown. Here’s why reaching the top of the mountain might be more challenging than expected:

As wages have risen in certain Latin American countries, they’ve lost their comparative advantage in producing low-cost goods. It’s like you started running up the hill but figured out in the middle you are getting increasingly tired until that significant advantage you once had is now working against you.

Many Latin American economies are heavily reliant on exporting raw materials like oil, copper, or soybeans just like Argentina and Brazil as mentioned above.

High levels of income inequality and limited access to quality education can restrict social mobility and create a shortage of skilled workers needed for innovation. In the long run, it’s impossible to sustain a country whose base is made of quicksand.

Read more:

Breaking Free: A Case Study

The middle-income trap, while daunting, is not an inescapable crevasse. Some countries have successfully navigated this economic icefall, countries located in Latin America.


Chile’s escape from the middle-income trap wasn’t a singular feat, but rather a long, multi-faceted journey. Here are some key aspects of their climb:

In the 1970s and 80s, Chile embarked on a series of economic reforms that emphasized free markets, trade liberalization, and privatization. This strategy, though controversial, helped attract foreign investment and stimulate competition, fostering a more dynamic and export-oriented economy.

Recognizing the importance of a skilled workforce, Chile prioritized investments in education. They expanded access to primary and secondary education, while at the same time focusing on technical and vocational training programs. This emphasis on human capital development created a talent pool equipped to support a more diversified economy.

Chile understood the limitations of relying solely on exporting commodities. They actively promoted the development of new industries, particularly in areas like manufacturing, forestry, and aquaculture. This diversification strategy helped them lessen their dependence on volatile commodity prices and expand their export base.

Chile actively pursued trade agreements with various countries and economic blocs. This strategy opened up new markets for Chilean exports and facilitated access to foreign technology and investment. These trade deals acted as strategic footholds for the financial health of the country.


Uruguay’s approach to escaping the middle-income trap differed from Chile’s in its emphasis on social investment. Here’s what set them apart:

Uruguay has a long history of strong social programs, including universal healthcare and social security. This focus on social welfare fostered a more equitable society and created a safety net for vulnerable communities. This social safety net provided a secure base camp from which to launch their economic climb.

Uruguay employs a progressive tax system, where those with higher incomes contribute a larger share. This approach helps to generate revenue for social programs and reduce income inequality, allowing a more inclusive economic ascent.

In recent years, Uruguay has made significant investments in technology and innovation. They’ve established technology parks, fostered collaboration between universities and businesses, and promoted the development of the IT sector. This focus on technology prepares them for the challenges and opportunities of the knowledge-based economy, providing them with the right tools for the climb.

Uruguay is known for its commitment to environmental sustainability. They’ve invested in renewable energy sources and implemented policies to protect their natural resources. This focus on sustainability ensures a more resilient and future-proof economy, allowing them to climb with a long-term vision.

Read more: 

The key takeaway?

The middle-income trap is a challenge, but not an untouchable one. By prioritizing innovation, education, and diversification, Latin American countries can rewrite their economic past and reach the coveted high-income point. It requires a delicate balancing act, much like navigating the many surprises of Everest. But with the right mix of policies, investments, and a sprinkle of innovation, these economies can transform from middle-income climbers stuck on the icefall into high-income experts, reaching new levels of growth. After all, who wouldn’t want to celebrate a successful economic expedition with a victory toast at the peak?

Author: Θανάσης Ντάτσης


  • The Middle-Income Trap: Myth or Reality? -World Bank
  • The Middle-Income Trap – The Economist
  • The Politics of Latin Americas Middle Income Trap – Council of Foreign Relations
  • Latin Americas Middle Income Trap – Americas Quarterly
  • Ending the Middle-Income Trap through Policy Design -Global Americans

Οι απόψεις που αναφέρονται στο κείμενο είναι προσωπικές του αρθρογράφου και δεν εκφράζουν απαραίτητα τις θέσεις του What Politics Means και της συντακτικής ομάδας.
Απαγορεύεται η αναδημοσίευση του άρθρου από άλλες ιστοσελίδες χωρίς άδεια του What Politics Means. Επιτρέπεται η αναδημοσίευση των δύο έως τριών πρώτων παραγράφων με την προσθήκη ενεργού link για την ανάγνωση της συνέχειας στο What Politics Means. Οι παραβάτες θα αντιμετωπίσουν νομικά μέτρα.